We pick out some popular debates in the vegan world and tackle them head-on. This time, we question whether or not vegans should go to zoos


Should vegans go too?

June is ‘National Zoo and Aquarium Month’, at least in America anyway, so this issue we consider the YES and NO arguments around zoos. For many vegans it goes without saying that zoos represent the use of animals for entertainment, and as such they’re not a place that vegans would visit or be in favour of. For others, the rescue and conservation efforts of some zoos makes the issue a little less black and white. As usual, the points presented here are purely so that both sides of the debate can be considered.


Debate: Should Vegans go to Zoos? 1

Zoos nurture and promote an interest in animals; they can be places of education. Learning about animals and seeing that they are intelligent creatures with the same basic needs as us might encourage people to alter the way they think, and ultimately change their diets and lifestyle to a cruelty-free one.

Not all zoos are the same, the levels of care given to the animals and the intentions of the zoo will vary wildly from place to place. Yes, some zoos are appalling and only interested in using animals for profit, but other zoos re-home rescued animals or ones that could no longer survive in the wild.

Animals rescued from circuses or previously owned as illegally purchased pets will find no better home than a good zoo. Without zoos like this, many of those animals might have to be euthanised, or never be presented with the opportunity of rescue and relocation in the first place.

There are also conservation zoos like Colchester Zoo, where there are projects and breeding programmes designed to help reintroduce threatened species back into the wild – to visit a zoo like that helps fund positive action.

Zoos with conservation programmes aren’t just positive, they are crucial for the safeguarding of endangered species. They can provide ‘back-up’ populations, which can then be used in reintroduction projects in the wild or even for the donation of sperm or eggs to wild populations.

People like to see and be with animals, and zoos can offer a much more educational and ethical alternative to circuses or places like seaworld where animals are made to perform. Many zoos try to recreate the natural habitats of animals, and the relationship between them and us is one of observation and learning, not entertainment and cruelty.


Debate: Should Vegans go to Zoos? 2

In zoos, animals are there for the entertainment of humans. Even when that entertainment has a degree of education, animals are still captive for our benefit. We can learn about animals and wildlife in many ways, we don’t have to keep them in zoos for the sake of our own education.

Even in zoos where conservation is a priority, there is still the issue that the freedoms and needs of individual animals are compromised in the name of ‘the greater good’. It is still speciesist to assume that we have the right to keep animals captive, even if we believe the ultimate outcomes associated with preventing extinction are positive.

Animals are not able to thrive in such small places. Even ‘good’ zoos simply can’t afford to provide spaces large enough to satisfy the normal roaming and exploring instincts of many animals. And as for bad zoos, some of the conditions can be so cramped and awful that animals suffer from ‘zoochosis’ – if you see an animal rocking back and forth, it’s likely that it’s suffering severe mental depression from being copped up in such confined and inadequate conditions.

Even if enclosures are of an adequate size, most zoos provide a chance to see non-native animals from completely different parts of the world. This can mean that animals are often kept in climates very different from the ones they should be living in. Even if the animals receive a good standard of care, it can’t be good to keep them in an alien environment.

If people want to see animals and fund something positive, there are plenty of amazing animal sanctuaries that desperately need money for upkeep, rescue operations, education programs, and investigations. Most zoos are for-profit operations, whereas animal sanctuaries prioritise the safety, comfort, and wellbeing of the animals.


We have presented you with two sides of the argument, but what do you think?

Have your say below…


Posted in ,


  1. Gigi on August 1, 2017 at 12:10 pm

    One day of “fun” for us means an entirely life of hell for them.. So the answer is quite obvious: say “No to Zoos”! Say no to animal exploitation and maybe instead of spending thousands taking animals out of their natural habitats, the same money should be spent in finding ways of treating and healing the ones in need of medical attention and helping the ones being abused.

  2. Swati Prakash on November 9, 2018 at 10:07 am

    One of the things that are promoted and marketed especially to schools and parents – Zoos. We pay to watch animals being confined to thousands of meters less space than they actually need, and to have them be mated and bred against their will with partners chosen for them instead of natural life in the wild, to have them stare at us staring at them…when all they can think of is ‘how can I escape’..and when they manage to do so..shot dead and blamed for harming humans when all they wanted was freedom…all in the name of education when we can learn all we need through videos, pictures, computer aided simulations….what if we were in their place? Why can’t we provide protection to these animals in the natural habitats instead of confining them to our whims in the name of conservation?

  3. Aly on June 26, 2019 at 5:09 am

    I’m kind of torn on this. On one hand, I hate to see any animal confined when they would clearly be happier free. On the other hand, there are species of animals (like the koala, which no longer has enough breeding age adults left to populate another generation in the wild), that would be extinct if it weren’t for what zoos and wildlife parks do.
    I also think people, adult and child alike, are more likely to care about animals they can see and experience up close as opposed to only on tv. And if they don’t care, why should they change?

  4. Rob McLeay on December 29, 2019 at 9:46 pm

    This is an issue that has made me conflicted. I in fact, visit Colchester zoo frequently as I believe in it being a conservation zoo. While I understand the “confinement” issues, and have experienced this in other zoos, I feel that the money I pay will help with conservation, education and reintegration of animals into the wild. I do not buy animals products and eat a plant- based.

    • Imogen on February 14, 2020 at 5:27 pm

      Hi Rob, I recently visited Colchester zoo for a college trip as I am studying animal management. We had a talk from one of the keepers and he confirmed that visitor money DOES go to the conservation projects they are doing at the moment. And I am sure you know about the two sun bears they rescued from horrendous conditions. I am stuck on the fence with it. We learnt about the way they train their animals so to reduce the amount of times they have to be anaesthetised. But anyways… yeah just wanted to assure you your money is going towards good projects.

  5. Charles Gonzalez on September 21, 2020 at 1:36 am

    Everything has pros and cons in life. If it’s a “good” zoo, I say the pros outweigh the cons.

Leave a Comment